Formal improvement plan required, consider role fit
Not Eligible
4. Weighting Considerations
Standard Approach: All 10 categories are weighted equally in this system. Each category contributes 10% to the overall score.
Manager Guidelines for Employee Ratings
Preparation
Before Rating: Review employee job responsibilities, goals set at beginning of period, and performance data throughout the review period. Gather specific examples of performance (both positive and areas for improvement).
Documentation: Collect emails, project outcomes, peer feedback, customer feedback, and any relevant metrics or KPIs.
Rating Best Practices
Be Specific: Provide concrete examples in the comments section. Instead of "good communicator," write "Led 3 client presentations with 95% satisfaction scores."
Be Objective: Focus on observable behaviors and measurable outcomes, not personality or subjective impressions.
Be Balanced: Include both strengths and areas for development. Even high performers have growth opportunities.
Be Honest: Inflated ratings hurt employees by denying them developmental feedback and create unfair promotion comparisons.
Be Consistent: Apply the same standards to all employees. If two people perform similarly, they should receive similar ratings.
Avoid Recency Bias: Consider the entire review period, not just the last few weeks. Review your documentation from throughout the period.
Avoid Halo Effect: Rate each category independently. A strength in one area should not automatically inflate ratings in unrelated areas.
Promotion Recommendations
Criteria to Consider: When recommending for promotion, evaluate:
Overall score (typically 3.5+ for promotion consideration)
Readiness for increased responsibility
Demonstration of next-level competencies
Impact on team and organization
Potential for growth
Comparison to others at target level
Justification: Provide clear, compelling justification that addresses:
Specific achievements and impact
How they exceed current role requirements
Evidence of next-level capabilities
Why now is the right time
What success would look like in new role
Delivering Feedback
Schedule Time: Allow adequate time (45-60 min) for thoughtful discussion. Do not rush the conversation.
Two-Way Dialogue: This is a conversation, not a presentation. Ask for employee self-assessment and perspective.
Start Positive: Begin with strengths and accomplishments. Build confidence before discussing development areas.
Be Direct: Be clear about ratings and expectations. Ambiguity helps no one.
Focus on Future: Discuss development plans, goals for next period, and career growth opportunities.
Document Everything: Keep notes from the meeting and follow up with a written summary.
Employee Self Assessment
Rate your own performance across 5 key competencies. Be honest and reflective.
Enter your unique employee ID
Self Evaluation
Refer to the Methodology tab for rating scale definitions.
1
Job Knowledge & Skills
My technical knowledge, skills, and expertise relevant to my role and responsibilities
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
2
Quality of Work
My accuracy, thoroughness, and attention to detail in the work I deliver
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
3
Problem Solving & Initiative
My ability to proactively identify challenges and take initiative in finding solutions
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
4
Teamwork & Collaboration
How effectively I work with others and contribute to shared team goals
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
5AI Utilization30%
Rate yourself on all 3 subcomponents β your final AI score is their average
AI AdoptionHow actively I use AI tools in my daily workflows
1 β Low5 β Exceptional
AI FluencyHow intelligently and effectively I use AI
1 β Low5 β Exceptional
AI ImpactThe tangible business value I create through my use of AI
1 β Low5 β Exceptional
My AI Utilization Score (averaged)β
Overall Self-Assessment Score
0.0
Employee Performance Rating Form
π Select your name to see employees reporting to you
Performance Evaluation
1
Job Knowledge & Skills
Technical competency and expertise in role-specific responsibilities
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
2
Quality of Work
Accuracy, thoroughness, and attention to detail in deliverables
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
3
Accountability, Efficiency & Competency
Dependability, ownership, timely execution and follow-through on commitments
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
4
Problem Solving & Initiative
Proactive approach to challenges and creative solution finding
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
5
Teamwork & Collaboration
Works well with others and contributes to team success
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
6AI Utilization30%
Rate all 3 subcomponents β final AI score is their average
AI AdoptionWhether they actually use AI in workflows
15
AI FluencyWhether they use it intelligently
15
AI ImpactWhether it creates business value
15
AI Utilization Score (averaged)β
7
OKR Completion
Success in meeting individual objectives and key results
1 β Low5 β Outstanding
Overall Performance Score
0.0
Not Rated
Promotion Recommendation
Management Decision Admin Only
This section can only be edited by administrators through the Dashboard.
Admin Dashboard
Access comprehensive performance analytics and manage ratings
Admin Login
Invalid username or password
Admin Dashboard
Manage employee performance ratings and reports
π
0
Total Ratings
β
0.0
Average Score
π
0
Promotion Ready
π―
0
Pending Decisions
All Employee Ratings
Step 2 of 3 β Talent Validation
Keeper Test
A quick calibration before final submission. Takes under 2 minutes.
Section 1 of 1
Keeper Question
If this employee informed you they were leaving tomorrow, or a decision has been taken to let go of this employee, how strongly would you try to retain them?
Note: This question assumes no exit decision has been made. If management has already decided to let this employee go, select 0 β Plan Exit.
0 β Plan exit5 β Fight to retain
βΉοΈ Scale is 0, 2, 3, 4, 5 β score 1 is intentionally not used.
Additional Comments
Optional β add any context or notes to support your rating.
β
You are about to submit.
Review your Keeper Test response below, then submit the complete rating.